Our thoughts on the lunchtime eating market

Bored, fickle, spoilt and impatient – not character traits I would willingly acknowledge to be mine. But when it comes to lunchtime foibles, I would nod reluctantly and add gluttony to my list of sins.

Like one-third of those Piper surveyed recently in a number of high density working lunchtime hotspots in London and Manchester, I am bored by what’s on offer for lunch around our offices in Notting Hill. It may be one of the capital’s most coveted postcodes, but it’s also a severely deprived lunchtime eating zone.

Yet despite these grudges and despite buying lunch out on most days (like one-third, who buy their lunch from on-the-go/quick service food brands more than three times a week), I spend a depressingly insignificant amount of time deciding where to graze from Monday to Friday. As the two-thirds in our survey, I choose where to buy lunch just before I go out/leave work. A further third don’t decide until they are walking down the street.

There is a noticeable automaton utility to lunchtime eating. Logistical excellence is clearly vital to consumers. Speed is the most important factor (87%) when choosing where to eat lunch, alongside proximity to the office (70%). In a market where speed is more important than the range of dishes available (73%) and proximity is more important than the availability of healthy lunch options (59%), an increased recalibration from function to brand experience is essential.

Like most spoilt Londoners working in the capital, I have an arrogant sense of entitlement surrounding the culinary diversity in my area – an artisan pulled pork burger, burrito, pho, banh mi, tonkotsu ramen, bulgogi laced with kimchee on tap. With around half of respondents thinking about the dish/meal/cuisine that they want and then thinking of where to get it, consumers like me are increasingly knowledgeable, fussy and dictatorial in their preferences.

Ironically, operators themselves are feeding the unswerving consumer demand for quality and service. Primarily, by providing ever-innovative food offerings, by becoming ever convenient

and by becoming logistically slick, lunchtime operators have spoilt their customers and have helped to make a consumer’s lunch decision trivial and spontaneous. Our research shows that, on average, we are willing to walk seven minutes to get lunch from a place that we like, though nearly half of Londoners (43%) won’t venture further than five minutes away.

As such, loyalty has become a function of convenience, fickleness has become rife and consumers’ insatiable craving for a broadened lunchtime repertoire easier to satisfy. Nearly two thirds (64%) of Londoners buy their lunch from 3+ places in a typical working week. For the half of respondents that are led by what they want to eat rather than where they want to eat, brand experience has become obsolete and function has trumped brand personality. As a consequence, loyalty and brand engagement have become trickier to promote in the lunchtime
space.

For lunchtime operators to succeed in this space and ultimately to dislodge the dominance of Pret A Manger, the undisputed king of convenience and logistical slickness, they need to shift from being operators to being brands and from serving a need to creating memorable experiences. The lunchtime market needs to take more lessons from the casual dining industry, which in its own right is now impeding on the space through its own takeaway services as well as through Deliveroo.

Driving real customer loyalty will mean increasing dwell times and providing customers with a more holistic all-day experience beyond the
queue-pay-leave-eat at the desk psychology. To convert a functional and clinical purchase into a thought-through experience will be difficult, but the winners in this space will manage to do so.

Organically, many operators have focused on having a fantastic coffee offering, which can help to inspire brand stickiness and drive visits throughout the day (50% of those who drink coffee say they are ‘more likely’ to revisit if a place has good coffee). They have played their part in transforming a swathe of Londoners into coffee snobs.

Another tactic has been to increase the size of the units and the availability of quality seating. Pret, again, is a good example. By buying adjacent units and increasing capacity, they have incentivised consumers to eat and drink on-site. Some operators have innovated by trying to capture the evening space – Pret has been trialling a dinner and alcohol offering at its Strand site, whilst brands such as The Grind, Fernandez & Wells and Notes make a smooth transition from cafés to wine bars.

Having an all-day offering will become even more important as the pressure to scale and build up a strong site pipeline increases. This will be especially important when proving a concept can succeed outside London. With a limited number of high footfall, high worker density locations outside London, lunchtime brands will need to adapt and offer a broadened added value experience that justifies the price.

For lunchtime brands operating outside the capital, price architecture is essential to get right – 67% of Londoners spend £5 or more on lunch compared to just 42% of Mancunians. Outside London, they too will face sterner competition from supermarkets – one-fifth of Mancunians buy their lunch from a supermarket 3+ times a week. As such, proposition and value flexibility will matter increasingly as the market in London becomes saturated.

Breaking out of the 12-2pm bubble is becoming a necessary differentiator both in terms of attracting customers and improving site performance. Brands will increasingly seek to establish a strong breakfast offering (23% of Londoners buy breakfast at least once a week from an on-the-go operator) as well as servicing mid-morning/mid-afternoon coffee runs and post-work snacks, meals and drinks.

Ultimately, the research has shown us that brands that are able to stay relevant throughout different day parts and offer a strong branded experience will prevail in the long-term. No matter how bored, fickle, spoilt and impatient we are, they’ll have something to keep everyone satisfied.

Yasha Estraikh, Customer Research & Insight lead at Piper

Our approach to brand-building.

[3 Mar 2021] - It’s an awkward time to send out emails, in knowing what to actually say. As we speak to hundreds of founders, we are mindful that…

Read more

Learn. Earn. And have fun: growing cultures in challenger brands

[25 Oct 2020] - If you come to our office and weave your way into the Cosy Room, you will find our library of business books, amassed over the…

Read more

Our investment in premium, natural Food-Grown® supplements brand Wild Nutrition

[11 Apr 2021] - We are delighted to announce our £5m investment into Wild Nutrition, an online natural health supplements brand that has disrupted the UK’s £20bn health and…

Read more

Our approach to brand-building.

[3 Mar 2021] - It’s an awkward time to send out emails, in knowing what to actually say. As we speak to hundreds of founders, we are mindful that…

Read more

PROPER bags new home in Europe’s leading healthy snacking group

[31 Jan 2021] - We are delighted to announce that Exponent Private Equity has taken a majority stake in our partner brand PROPER, creating a partnership with Eat Real…

Read more

Bloom & Wild receives £75m investment

[24 Jan 2021] - Bloom & Wild to become Europe’s most loved flower gifting brand with £75m investment We are excited to announce an investment of £75m into Bloom…

Read more